Skip to content

Conversation

mhauru
Copy link
Member

@mhauru mhauru commented Jun 17, 2025

Another case where I'm changing things that I only have a superficial understanding of. @willtebbutt, could you please check that check_varargs makes sense to you, and feel free to propose a better solution.

All the tests added here fail on main.

Closes #186

@mhauru mhauru requested review from willtebbutt and sunxd3 June 17, 2025 10:28
Copy link

Libtask.jl documentation for PR #188 is available at:
https://TuringLang.github.io/Libtask.jl/previews/PR188/

@mhauru
Copy link
Member Author

mhauru commented Jun 17, 2025

This great tip from @simeonschaub helped me simplify the implemenation a lot. I feel much less insecure about the new version, but would still be good to get Will's comments on this.

Copy link
Member

@willtebbutt willtebbutt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is very nice indeed.

Thanks @simeonschaub for the advice.

@mhauru mhauru merged commit baf1c50 into main Jun 17, 2025
14 of 19 checks passed
@mhauru mhauru deleted the mhauru/issue-186 branch June 17, 2025 12:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DynamicCallable issue with varargs
2 participants